University of Exeter
Turning service evidence into shared transformation direction
The University of Exeter did not have a shortage of transformation activity. The challenge was that no one had a shared, end-to-end view of the services being changed.
Different teams and initiatives held credible but partial perspectives. Insight existed across research, surveys, service data, reports and the knowledge of experienced colleagues. But it remained distributed across organisational boundaries, making it difficult for leaders to see how services connected, where problems were recurring and where change would create the greatest value.
I was brought in by the Divisional Director of Digital Transformation to help establish a more service-led approach to transformation – grounding change in how students experienced services and the operational reality involved in delivering them. I led four connected discoveries spanning undergraduate, postgraduate taught, postgraduate research and alumni experiences. Together, these made more than 40 services visible across seven phases of the student lifecycle.
But visibility alone was not enough. The discoveries showed that services were being delivered by capable teams, but often without end-to-end ownership across the organisational, system and platform boundaries students had to navigate. Looking across those boundaries made visible the gaps, repeated handoffs and hidden compensating activity that no individual team could see in full.
Three significant peaks of fragmentation emerged. This was an important turning point. Fragmentation stopped being a broad description of organisational complexity and became something we could locate. Leaders and teams could see where different problems shared the same underlying conditions, where isolated improvements would be insufficient and where focused intervention might unlock wider value.
It also exposed a less visible risk: good outcomes could coexist with structural fragility. Services could appear to work because students and staff were absorbing the complexity that their design left unresolved.
As the service-led approach developed, Assessment and Feedback became an opportunity to prove it within a complex service area. Connecting student experience with the academic, administrative and technological realities behind it turned a broad challenge into two defined pilot opportunities: one addressing structural conditions and another focused on experience. Both were developed far enough to give the University practical, evidence-based options for internal consideration and handover.
Postgraduate research required a different response. Evidence from stakeholder interviews and two co-creation workshops created an end-to-end institutional view of the doctoral environment. It surfaced connected questions about visibility, dependency on key individuals, ownership and accountability.
The PGR discovery was designed to establish whether wider transformation was needed, at what scale and where it should begin. The evidence was translated into an institutional case for change, strategic questions and grounded opportunities for action. This gave senior leaders a clearer basis for considering how postgraduate research should be understood, governed and designed as part of wider transformation.
The fourth discovery then made a different analytical move. It stepped across the earlier discoveries to test whether the conditions we had identified were isolated to individual services or recurring across the wider evidence.
The question was no longer simply: What has each discovery found?
It became: What does the organisation now understand that no individual discovery could show on its own?
Working with leaders and teams across the University, we brought the evidence together, tested the fragmentation analysis and shaped the emerging picture into cases for change and strategic questions. This moved the conversation beyond which projects to prioritise, towards what students should be able to rely on, what the University must be able to do consistently, and how ownership, authority and investment should be organised.
AI helped organise and compare material at scale, while careful checking, contextual judgement and testing with colleagues kept the interpretation grounded in the source evidence.
Instead of asking the Transformation Board to respond to another collection of findings, the work located the concentrations of fragmentation, named the conditions behind them and framed choices about where coordinated intervention could have the greatest impact.
This changed the nature of the leadership conversation. The Board could step back from individual initiatives and discuss scope, dependencies, sponsorship, measures and sequencing. It supported taking Connected Onboarding forward while challenging the team to define its boundaries, represent different student cohorts, involve the right academic and professional-services leaders, and combine an end-to-end blueprint with practical early improvements.
The emerging direction connected three horizons of change: improving real service outcomes now, building reusable capabilities that make those outcomes more reliable, and using the learning to shape the University’s future services.
The internal team then carried that direction into action. Using the service evidence, end-to-end thinking and fragmentation approach developed through the discoveries, it continued shaping Connected Onboarding for its next stage.
The progression was tangible:
- more than 40 services became visible across seven student lifecycle phases
- three concentrations of fragmentation and their underlying conditions were identified
- two Assessment and Feedback pilot opportunities were defined for handover
- the postgraduate research discovery produced an institutional case for change and grounded opportunities for leadership consideration
- evidence was translated into choices for the Transformation Board
- Connected Onboarding gained leadership support for further development
- the internal team continued applying the approach independently
The most valuable outcome was not another report. The work gave the University a shared picture of services that had previously been understood in parts. It created greater confidence in the case for service-led change, clearer transformation choices and practical opportunities for action.
Most importantly, the approach did not leave with me. The internal team could use it to continue connecting evidence, operational reality and transformation decisions without remaining dependent on an external consultant.
That is an important measure of successful consultancy: not simply delivering an answer, but leaving an organisation better able to see, decide and act for itself.
"Alan brings exceptional clarity to complex challenges. He has a rare ability to translate strategy into action, grounded in a deep understanding of user needs. A collaborative and insightful partner, he consistently helps leadership move from complexity to confident decision-making."
- Evidence-led change
- Leadership decision support
- Organisational alignment
- Service design
- Service transformation
- Transformation strategy



